
CHAVEZ ENCYCLOPEDIA OF POPULAR CULTURE
482
declined. While searching for a way to continue his vision of the
Lord’s work, Miller read some of Vincent’s writings, came to the
belief that financial salvation was attainable if some new purpose for
the site could be found, and contacted Vincent. Vincent disliked
razzle-dazzle evangelism but agreed that training young men and
women as Sunday school teachers could be the worthy purpose that
Miller sought.
A Sunday School Assembly was formed and enjoyed immediate
success. However, a looming problem was that as the school’s
enrollment steadily increased, so did concerns about chaperoning
students. Miller and Vincent feared possible scandals in sylvan
glades, unless idle time could be filled with regular and wholesome
educational and entertainment programs. To direct such activities,
they engaged William Rainey Harper, an Ohio-born educator, who
would later be John D. Rockefeller’s choice to serve as president of
the University of Chicago.
Like Miller and Vincent, Harper never opposed an idea because
it was new or unproven. Four years after the Sunday School Assembly
began operations the Chautauqua Literary Scientific Circle came into
being. One measure of its success was that within twenty years, ten
thousand reading circles, all of which took their lead from the
institution’s example, were operating throughout America. One fourth
were in villages of fewer than five hundred people, and Chautauqua
served them diligently, providing reading lists and other materials.
But innovations at Chautauqua did not stop with the training of
Sunday school teachers and reading circles. As early as 1883, it
chartered itself as a university and would remain one for twelve years,
until established universities began to offer summer courses. Some
three hundred ‘‘independent’’ or loosely affiliated similar institutions
used Chautauqua as a model without charge by the institution. As
early as 1885, a Chautauqua Assembly was held in Long Beach,
California, where rollers breaking on wide stretches of white sand and
bracing sea air further encouraged those who sought spiritual and
intellectual enlightenment during summer months.
For the benefit of those who could not afford travel to New York,
California, or independent Chautauquas, ‘‘tent chautauquas’’ came
into being. A tent would be pitched in a meadow and lecturers
engaged to inform locals on history, politics, and other subjects of
general as well as religious interest. Among the speakers, William
Jennings Bryan is said to have given fifty lectures in twenty-eight
days. The average price for admission was fifty cents, and no drinking
or smoking was allowed. A Methodist Dining Tent or Christian
Endeavor Ice Cream Tent supplied all refreshments.
Just after the turn of the century, Chautauqua was a ‘‘cultural
phenomenon with some of the sweep and force of a tidal wave,’’
wrote historian Russell Lynes. Women, who heretofore had little
chance to attend college, for the first time had an organization aware
of their educational needs that sought to begin opening up opportuni-
ties for them. By 1918, more than a million Americans would take
correspondence courses sponsored by the institution. A symphony
orchestra was created there, and in 1925 George Gershwin composed
his Concerto in F in a cabin near the Lake.
In the late 1920s, however, the advent of the automobile and the
mobility it offered the masses seemed to signal Chautauqua’s end.
Not only were untold millions abandoning stultifying small towns for
the temptations of metropolises, but those who stayed put had easy
access to cities for year-round education and entertainment.
In 1933 the institution went into receivership. Somehow it
refused to die. By the early 1970s, with buildings in disrepair and
attendance lagging, it appeared finally to be in its death throes—at
which point it renewed its existence. Richard Miller, a Milwaukee
resident and great-grandson of founder Lewis Miller, became chair-
man of the Chautauqua board. He began an aggressive fund-raising
campaign and built up financial resources until at the end of the
twentieth century the institution had $40 million and held pledges of
another $50 million from wealthy members.
More importantly, the Chautauqua Institution reached out for
new publics even as it preserved its willingness to continue a tradition
of serving people with insatiable curiosity about the world in which
they lived and a never-ending need for information. Although the tone
of its evangelical heritage remained, Catholics were welcome, about
20 percent of Chautauquans were Jews, and members of the rapidly
expanding black middle class were encouraged to join.
‘‘This is a time of growth,’’ declared eighty-five-year-old Alfreda
L. Irwin, the institution’s official historian, whose family had been
members for six generations, in 1998. ‘‘Chautauqua is very open and
would like to have all sorts of people come here and participate. I
think it will happen, just naturally.’’
—Milton Goldin
F
URTHER READING:
Harrison, Harry P. (as told to Karl Detzer). Culture under Canvas:
The Story of Tent Chautauqua. New York, Hastings House, 1958.
Lynes, Russell. The Taste-Makers. New York, Harper, 1954.
Smith, Dinitia. ‘‘A Utopia Awakens and Shakes Itself.’’ New York
Times. August 17, 1998, E1.
Chavez, Cesar (1927-1993)
Rising from the status of a migrant worker toiling in the
agricultural fields of Yuma, Arizona, to the leader of America’s first
successful farm worker’s union, Cesar Chavez was once described by
Robert F. Kennedy as ‘‘one of the heroic figures of our time.’’
Although by nature a meek and humble man known more for his
leadership abilities than his public speaking talents, Chavez appealed
to the conscience of America in the 1970s by convincing seventeen
million people to boycott the sale of table grapes for five consecutive
years. Chavez’s United Farm Workers Organizing Committee
(UFWOC) spearheaded the drive for economic and social justice for
Mexican and Mexican American farm workers. Lending their support
for this cause was a wide cross section of Americans, including
college students, politicians, priests, nuns, rabbis, protestant minis-
ters, unionists, and writers. By forming one of the first unions to fight
for the rights of Mexican Americans, Chavez became an important
symbol of the Chicano movement.
It would be a vast understatement to say that Chavez rose from
humble beginnings. Born in 1927, Chavez spent his early years on his
family’s small farm near Yuma. When his parents lost their land
during the Great Depression, they moved to California to work in the
fields as migrant workers. Young Chavez joined his parents to help
harvest carrots, cotton, and grapes under the searing California sun.
The Chavez family led a nomadic life, moving so often in search of
migrant work that Cesar attended more than thirty elementary schools,
many of which were segregated. By seventh grade, Cesar dropped out
of school to work in the fields full time.