
Uncorrected Proof
BookID 160928 ChapID 10 Proof# 1 - 29/07/09
280 10 Magnetic Ordering and Spin Waves
Fig. 10.7. A chain of magnetic spins interacting via Heisenberg exchange interac-
tion. (a) Single domain, (b) a domain wall, (c) gradual spin flip
10.1.4 Domain Wall 71
Consider a chain of magnetic spins (Fig. 10.7a) interacting via Heisenberg 72
exchange interaction 73
H
ex
= −2J
i,j
s
i
·s
j
,
where the sum is over all pairs of nearest neighbors. Compare the energy
74
of this configuration with that having an abrupt domain wall as shown in 75
Fig. 10.7b. Only spins (i)and(j) have a misalignment so that 76
ΔE = H
ex
(i ↑,j ↓) − H
ex
(i ↑,j ↑)
= −2J(
1
2
)(−
1
2
) −
−2J(
1
2
)(
1
2
)
= J.
(10.18)
Energetically it is more favorable to have the spin flip gradually as shown
77
in Fig. 10.7c. If we assume the angle between each neighboring pair in the 78
domain wall is Φ, we can write 79
(E
ex
)
ij
= −2Js
i
·s
j
= −2Js
i
s
j
cos Φ. (10.19)
Now, if the spin turns through an angle Φ
0
(Φ
0
= π in the case shown in 80
Fig. 10.7b) in N steps, where N is large, then Φ
ij
Φ
0
N
within the domain 81
wall, and we can approximate cos Φ
ij
by cos Φ
ij
≈ 1 −
1
2
Φ
2
0
N
2
. Therefore, the 82
exchange energy for a neighboring spin pair will be 83
(E
ex
)
ij
= −2JS
2
1 −
1
2
Φ
2
0
N
2
(10.20)
The increase in exchange energy due to the domain wall will be
84
E
ex
= N
JS
2
Φ
2
0
N
2
= JS
2
Φ
2
0
N
. (10.21)
85
Clearly, the exchange energy is lower if the domain wall is very wide. In fact, 86
if no other energies were involved, the domain wall width Na (where a is the 87
atomic spacing) would be infinite. However, there is another energy involved, 88
the anisotropy energy. Let us consider it next. 89