in headspace volume (10). In conventional retail MA
packs, pack collapse is minimized by limiting the pro-
portion of CO
2
to less than 40% and having a large
headspace volume above the food. However, these proce-
dures limit the shelf-life extension potential since lower
levels of bacteriostatic CO
2
are maintained within MA
packs. Additionally, the larger headspace volume required
results in a decreased packing density, with asso-
ciated higher costs of production, storage, and distribu-
tion (8).
An innovative process for solving the problem of pack
collapse is now widely used. This two-phase process is
based on the use of solid and gaseous CO
2
in MA packs (7).
A weighed tablet of solid CO
2
is dispensed into a thermo-
formed tray containing the food product, just before gas
flushing and sealing. The solid CO
2
sublimes to gaseous
CO
2
after sealing and causes the semirigid package to
swell. However, after a few hours, an equilibrium is
established between the gaseous CO
2
in the headspace
and the CO
2
absorbed by the food, and hence the package
reverts to its original shape. Valle Spluga patented the
process and has successfully used this process to market
spring chickens in MA packs that maintain high levels of
CO
2
with a minimum headspace (8).
GUIDELINES FOR THE MANUFACTURE AND HANDLING
OF MA PACKED FOODS
MA-packed chilled foods have been marketed in Europe
for many years, and during this period they have main-
tained an excellent safety record, providing the consumer
with high-quality, safe, and fresh products. It is impor-
tant, however, for all those involved in the manufacture
and handling of MA-packed chilled foods to be vigilant
about possible food safety hazards, especially in the light
of increased regulatory and consumer concern about
the perceived rise in food poisoning incidents. It is im-
perative that the food safety of such products not be
compromised by complacency and poor manufacturing or
handling practices. Such a situation would seriously com-
promise the safety of MAP technology and hence its
further application as a preservation technique for chilled
foods (3).
REPORT ON VACUUM PACKAGING AND ASSOCIATED
PROCESSES
The UK Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety
of Food (ACMSF) has published a report on the potential
hazards of vacuum packaging and associated processes
such as ‘‘sous vide’’ and MAP (12). Emphasis is placed on
the safety aspects of chilled foods, with particular refer-
ence to the risks of botulism. Preventative measures have
been identified, and possible mechanisms for control have
been detailed. Among the many recommendations is one
which states that chilled prepared food packed under
reduced O
2
levels with an assigned shelf life of more
than 10 days should contain one or more controlling
factors in addition to chill temperatures to prevent growth
and toxin production by Clostridium botulinum. Control-
ling factors include heat treatment, acidity and salt levels,
and water activity. The UK government endorses this
recommendation and has drawn it to the attention of
appropriate trade and professional bodies.
CONCLUSIONS
MAP is still one of the most exciting and innovative areas
of the packaging industry. New developments in both
packaging materials/machinery and food product applica-
tions are being described at an ever-increasing rate. The
biggest growth areas are likely to be in easy-opening MA
packs and methods for measuring integrity. The MAP
chilled-food market in Europe is substantial and has
enjoyed considerable growth in recent years because of
the important benefits it provides to food manufacturers,
retailers, and consumers alike. Although MAP has been
used primarily for red meats, tremendous opportunities
exist for the MAP of other foods.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. www.food and drink europe.com
2. R. Pearson, ‘‘The Quiet Revolution. Imperial Chemical Com-
pany,’’ Plast. Today 29 (1988).
3. B. P. F. Day, Guidelines for the Manufacture and Handling of
Modified Atmosphere Packed Food Products, CCFRA Techni-
cal Manual 34, Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire, UK,
1992, p. 3.
4. B. P. F. Day, ‘‘Novel MAP for Fresh Prepared Produce,’’ Eur.
Food Drink Rev. 1, 73–80 (1996).
5. K. C. Spencer, ‘‘The Use of Argon and Other Noble Gases for
the MAP of Foods,’’ paper presented at International Con-
ference on MAP and Related Technologies, CCFRA, Chipping
Campden, Gloucestershire, UK, September 6–7, 1995.
6. M. I. Gonzalez and B. P. F. Day, The Effects of Novel Atmo-
sphere Packaging (MAP) on Fresh Prepared Produce Growth,
in Proceedings of the Cost 915 Conference, Cuidad Universi-
taria, Madrid, Spain. October 15–16, 1999.
7. B. P. F. Day, Fresh Prepared Produce: GMP for High Oxygen
MAP and Non-sulphite Dipping, CCFRA Guideline No. 31.
Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire, UK, 2001, pp. 70–75.
8. B. P. F. Day, ‘‘Recent Developments in MAP,’’ Eur. Food Drink
Rev. 2, 87–95 (1993).
9. B. P. F. Day, and L. G. M. Gorris, ‘‘Modified Atmosphere
Packaging of Fresh Produce on the Western European Mar-
ket,’’ ZFL 44(1/2), 32 (1993).
10. G. Robertson, Food Packaging Principles and Practice, 2nd
edition, CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton,
2006, pp. 285–311.
11. L. Potter, E. L. Lloyd, and A. J. Campbell, The Manufacture
and Integrity of Seals for Packaged Foods, CCFRA Review 48,
Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire, UK, 2006, p. 23.
12. ACMSF, Report on Vacuum Packaging and Associated Pro-
cesses, Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety
of Food, HMSO, London, 1992.Information emanating from
this Research Association is given after the exercise of all
reasonable care and skill in its compilation, preparation, and
issue, but is provided without liability in its application and
use.
MODIFIED ATMOSPHERE PACKAGING MARKET, EUROPE 797