
434    Chapter 10
Q:
 Does using one of these methods 
of sampling guarantee that the sample 
won’t be biased?
A: They don’t guarantee that the sample 
won’t be biased, but they do minimize the 
chances of this happening. By really thinking 
about your target population and how you 
can make your sample representative of it, 
you stand a much better chance of coming 
up with an unbiased, representative sample.
Q:
 Do I have to use any of these 
methods? Can’t I just choose items at 
random.
A: Choosing items at random is simple 
random sampling. Yes, this is one approach 
you can take, but one thing to be aware of is 
that there is a chance your sample will not 
be representative of the population at large.
Q:
 But why? Surely if I choose items 
at random, then my sample is bound to 
be representative of the target population.
A: Not necessarily. You see, if you choose 
sampling units at random, then there’s a 
chance that purely at random, you could 
choose a sample that doesn’t effectively 
represent the target population. As an 
example, if you choose customers of the 
Statsville Health Club completely at random, 
there’s a chance that you might choose only 
attendees of one particular class, or of one 
particular gender. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
There might also be a case where you think 
you’re sampling at random, when really 
you’re not. As an example, if you conduct a 
survey to find out customer satisfaction, but 
leave it up to customers whether or not they 
respond, you may well end up with a biased 
sample as customers have to be sufficiently 
motivated to respond. The customers who 
are most motivated to take part in the survey 
will be those who are either strongly satisfied 
or strongly dissatisfied. You are less likely to 
hear from those customers without strong 
feelings, yet those people may make up the 
bulk of the population.
Q:
 How about if I just increase the size 
of my sample? Will that get around bias?
A: The larger your sample, the less 
chance there is of your sample being 
biased, and this is one way of minimizing the 
chances of getting a biased sample using 
simple random sampling. The trouble is, the 
larger your sample, the more cumbersome 
and time-consuming it can be to gather data.
Q:
 What’s the difference between 
stratified sampling and clustered 
sampling?
A: With stratified sampling, you divide 
the population into different groups or strata, 
where all the units within a stratum are as 
similar to each other as possible. In other 
words, you take some characteristic or 
property such as gender, and use this as the 
basis for the strata. Once you’ve split the 
population into strata, you perform simple 
random sampling on each stratum. 
 
 
With clustered sampling, your aim is to 
divide the population into clusters, trying to 
make the clusters as alike as possible. You 
then use simple random sampling to choose 
clusters, and then sample everything in 
those clusters.
Q:
 I see. So with stratified sampling, 
you make each stratum as different as 
possible, and with clustered sampling, 
you make each cluster as similar as 
possible.
A: Exactly.
Q:
 So what about systematic 
sampling?
A: With systematic sampling, you choose 
a number, k, and then choose every kth 
item for your sample. This way of sampling 
is fairly quick and easy, but it doesn’t mean 
that your sample will be representative of 
the population. In fact, this sort of sampling 
can only be used effectively if there are no 
repetitive patterns or organization in the 
sampling frame
Q:
 Drawing lots sounds antiquated. 
Do people still do that?
A: It’s not as common as it used to be, 
but it’s still a way of sampling.
there are no dumb questions