
434 Chapter 10
Q:
Does using one of these methods
of sampling guarantee that the sample
won’t be biased?
A: They don’t guarantee that the sample
won’t be biased, but they do minimize the
chances of this happening. By really thinking
about your target population and how you
can make your sample representative of it,
you stand a much better chance of coming
up with an unbiased, representative sample.
Q:
Do I have to use any of these
methods? Can’t I just choose items at
random.
A: Choosing items at random is simple
random sampling. Yes, this is one approach
you can take, but one thing to be aware of is
that there is a chance your sample will not
be representative of the population at large.
Q:
But why? Surely if I choose items
at random, then my sample is bound to
be representative of the target population.
A: Not necessarily. You see, if you choose
sampling units at random, then there’s a
chance that purely at random, you could
choose a sample that doesn’t effectively
represent the target population. As an
example, if you choose customers of the
Statsville Health Club completely at random,
there’s a chance that you might choose only
attendees of one particular class, or of one
particular gender.
There might also be a case where you think
you’re sampling at random, when really
you’re not. As an example, if you conduct a
survey to find out customer satisfaction, but
leave it up to customers whether or not they
respond, you may well end up with a biased
sample as customers have to be sufficiently
motivated to respond. The customers who
are most motivated to take part in the survey
will be those who are either strongly satisfied
or strongly dissatisfied. You are less likely to
hear from those customers without strong
feelings, yet those people may make up the
bulk of the population.
Q:
How about if I just increase the size
of my sample? Will that get around bias?
A: The larger your sample, the less
chance there is of your sample being
biased, and this is one way of minimizing the
chances of getting a biased sample using
simple random sampling. The trouble is, the
larger your sample, the more cumbersome
and time-consuming it can be to gather data.
Q:
What’s the difference between
stratified sampling and clustered
sampling?
A: With stratified sampling, you divide
the population into different groups or strata,
where all the units within a stratum are as
similar to each other as possible. In other
words, you take some characteristic or
property such as gender, and use this as the
basis for the strata. Once you’ve split the
population into strata, you perform simple
random sampling on each stratum.
With clustered sampling, your aim is to
divide the population into clusters, trying to
make the clusters as alike as possible. You
then use simple random sampling to choose
clusters, and then sample everything in
those clusters.
Q:
I see. So with stratified sampling,
you make each stratum as different as
possible, and with clustered sampling,
you make each cluster as similar as
possible.
A: Exactly.
Q:
So what about systematic
sampling?
A: With systematic sampling, you choose
a number, k, and then choose every kth
item for your sample. This way of sampling
is fairly quick and easy, but it doesn’t mean
that your sample will be representative of
the population. In fact, this sort of sampling
can only be used effectively if there are no
repetitive patterns or organization in the
sampling frame
Q:
Drawing lots sounds antiquated.
Do people still do that?
A: It’s not as common as it used to be,
but it’s still a way of sampling.
there are no dumb questions