
JWBK011-11 JWBK011-Hogg August 12, 2005 19:21 Char Count= 0
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION 287
When all the lactose has been consumed, the repressor protein is free to block the
operator gene once more, and the needless synthesis of further β-galactosidase ceases.
The lac operon can also be induced by isopropyl β-thiogalactoside (IPTG); E. coli
is not able to break this down, so the genes remain permanently switched on. IPTG is
utilised as an inducer in cloning systems involving the expression of the lacZ gene on
pUC plasmids (Chapter 12).
The lac operon is subject to control by positive as well as negative regulator proteins.
Transcription of the operon only occurs if another regulatory protein called catabolite
activator protein (CAP) is bound to the promoter sequence (see Box 11.5). This is
dependent on a relatively high concentration of the nucleotide cAMP which only occurs
when glucose is scarce. The activation of the lac operon thus occurs only if lactose is
present and glucose is (almost) absent.
Repression of gene expression
The induction of gene expression, such as we have just described for the lac operon,
generally relates to catabolic (breakdown) reactions. Anabolic (synthetic) reactions,
such as those leading to the production of specific amino acids, by contrast, are often
controlled by the repression of key genes.
Enzyme repression mechanisms operate along similar lines to induction mechanisms,
but the determining factor here is not the substrate of the enzymes in question (lactose
in our example), but the end-product of their action. The trp operon contains a cluster
of genes encoding five enzymes involved in the synthesis of the amino acid tryptophan.
(Figure 11.16) In the presence of tryptophan, the cell has no need to synthesise its
Box 11.5 A choice of substrates
Glucose is central to the reactions of glycolysis (Chapter 6), and is utilised by E. coli
with high efficiency, because the enzymes involved are permanently switched on
or constitutive. The β-galactosidase required for lactose breakdown, however, must
be induced. What happens then, when E . coli is presented with a mixture of both
glucose and lactose? It would be more efficient to metabolise the glucose, with the
ready-to-use enzymes, but from what you have learnt elsewhere in this section (see
Figure 11.15b), the presence of lactose would induce formation of β-galactosidase
and subsequent lactose breakdown, a less energy-efficient way of going about
things. In fact, E. coli has a way of making sure that while the readily utilised glu-
cose is present, it takes precedence. It does this by repressing the formation of
β-galactosidase, a phenomenon known as catabolite repression. Thus, the pres-
ence of a ‘preferred’ nutrient prevents the synthesis of enzymes needed to
metabolise a less favoured one.
This is because glucose inhibits the formation of cAMP, which is required for the
binding of the CAP to its site on the lac promoter. When glucose levels drop, more
cAMP forms and causes CAP to bind to the CAP binding site. Thus, after a delay, the
enzymes needed for lactose catabolism are synthesised, and the lactose is utilised,
leading to a diauxic growth curve (see Chapter 5).