
482
Planning a Windows Server Installation
If you’re a software developer or a network manager who needs to make
sure that software is compatible with multiple operating systems, the
multiboot feature can be useful. For most servers, however, you want to
install just one operating system.
A much better alternative to a multiboot installation is to use virtual
machine software such as VMWare. This software allows you to install a
development version of an operating system such as Windows Server 2008
R2 within an already installed operating system. For more information, see
www.vmware.com.
Choosing a file system
Windows servers provide three choices for the file system format: FAT,
FAT32, and NTFS. In most cases, you should choose NTFS. Well, actually, you
should use NTFS in almost all cases. Come to think of it, you should always
use NTFS.
The name FAT refers to the file allocation table, which was used in the original
version of MS-DOS back when disco was still popular. FAT was a simple but
effective way to track disk space allocated to files on diskettes and on small
hard drives. The original FAT system used 16-bit disk addresses to divide
the total space on a disk into 65,526 units, called clusters, each of which
could be allocated to any file on the disk. The size of each cluster could vary
from as little as 2K to as much as 256K, depending on the size of the drive.
When disk drives started to get bigger than 512MB (can you remember when
512MB was a huge disk?), FAT was upgraded to FAT32, which used 32-bit
addresses for clusters. That allowed a maximum of 524,208 clusters on the
disk with the size of each cluster ranging from 4K to 32K, depending on the
size of the drive.
FAT32 was a nice improvement over FAT, but both suffer from several
inherent problems:
✦ Even with 32-bit addresses, FAT32 is stretched by today’s 200GB+ disk
drives.
✦ Neither FAT nor FAT32 has built-in security features.
✦ Frankly, FAT and FAT32 are inherently unreliable. Most users, at one
time or another, lose files due to the unreliability of FAT/FAT32.
✦ FAT and FAT32 allocate space inefficiently on large volumes because the
smallest unit of space that they can allocate must be large — as much as
256K in some cases.
49_625873-bk07ch01.indd 48249_625873-bk07ch01.indd 482 9/21/10 10:37 PM9/21/10 10:37 PM