230 MITOCHONDRIAL ELECTRON TRANSFER
For almost two decades, several prominent biochemistry laboratories sought
to identify the mysterious compound X ∼ P, which was postulated to be the
intermediate trapping the free energy from mitochondrial electron transport
(and oxidations). A mindset derived from classical biochemistry required the
presence of a compound, X ∼ P, even if very short - lived, as part of the mecha-
nism of attaching inorganic phosphate to ADP. It should be pointed out that
“ X ” could also represent a side chain of an amino acid of one or more subunits
in the electron transport chain. For a while, phosphorylated histidine was a
favorite, but in the end all efforts to identify such a chemical intermediate
failed completely.
In the conformational coupling hypothesis the energy from oxidations and
electron transport was thought to be “ captured ” in a high - energy conforma-
tional state of a protein (ATP synthase) which could then be used to drive the
synthesis of ATP. It is noteworthy that a model for conformational coupling
included two alternating sites for ADP and P
i
binding, ATP synthesis and
release (219) . Conformational changes are still very much part of the mecha-
nism of electron transport and proton pumping. On the other hand, it is true
that “ . . . the word conformational, applied to proteins, acquired a kind of
magical signifi cance, enabling proteins to accomplish anything (conveniently
without the need to specify any biochemical mechanism) . . . ” (220) . The fun-
damental question is concerned with the coupling of electron transport and
ATP synthesis, and conformational changes in the complexes of the ETC and
in the ATP synthase are not physically coupled.
P. Mitchell was able to approach the problem from a radically different
direction. Restating a view expressed by van ’ t Hoff, he has pointed out that
“ imagination and shrewed guess work are powerful instruments for acquiring
scientifi c knowledge quickly and inexpensively . . . ” . In his view of science,
adopted from Popper, preconceived models are subject to constant experimen-
tal testing, . . . ” thus detecting and discarding the concepts that are false and
retaining concepts that show by their survival that they are factually serviceable
because they represent reality as far as it is known. ” Several concepts merged
in an inspired hypothesis continuously supported by accumulating experimen-
tal evidence, which was almost nonexistent at the beginning. Numerous papers
and reviews have appeared by him and his colleagues (149, 218, 220 – 227) ; a
very readable and comprehensive review of the chemiosmotic hypothesis and
the evolution of the ideas leading to it is the Ninth Sir Hans Krebs Lecture
delivered in 1978 (220) . It is probably fair to say that although Mitchell con-
tributed to the experimental support of his hypothesis, his brilliant idea pro-
voked many other talented individuals to either support or challenge it, and in
the end it was verifi ed as another major landmark in the intellectual landscape
of bioenergetics. An excellent, exhaustive, and authoritative theoretical and
experimental foundation for the chemiosmotic hypothesis can be found in the
book by Nicholls and Ferguson (228) . There have also been some voices who
dispute the details of the story line presented above (229) , and it will remain
for the historians of science to sort out claims for priorities of ideas.