tubes will end up positive. At the 100-fold dilution, on average only 0.05 cell is added to
each tube, and hence all may be expected to be negative.
The pattern of positive tubes that results (in this case, perhaps 5-3-0) is an indication of
the cell numbers originally present. Through a mathematical procedure, in fact, the most
probable number (MPN) of cells originally present resulting in that pattern can be esti-
mated. These values have been tabulated for several different numbers of replicates (e.g.,
3, 5, and 10 tubes per dilution), and also for different dilution factors (e.g., two fold as
well as 10-fold serial dilutions). Note that a positive or negative result in each tube is used
to arrive at a quantitative estimate of cell numbers. The estimate from a pattern of 5-3-0 is
an MPN of 8.0 mL
1
of the original sample. (A response of 5-2-0 gives an MPN of 5.0,
the starting value used in the example.)
An obvious disadvantage of this approach is that it produces a statistical estimate rather
than an actual count. For example, with the 5-3-0 example, there is a 95% likelihood
that the actual number is between 3.0 and 25, an undesirably broad range. On the other
hand, the MPN is potentially useful for a wide variety of samples and can be adapted for
many types of microorganisms, including some for which other methods have not been
successful.
Turbidity and Absorbance A method that can be used in laboratory cultures, especially
pure cultures, grown on soluble (and preferably colorless) media is measurement of
turbidity (cloudiness) or absorbance. Turbidity is the amount of light dispersed 90
from the path of incident light passing through a material. It is measured with a turbidi-
meter using a photocell at right angles to the light path. Absorbance is the reduction in the
transmission of light along the light path and may occur due to both dispersion and
absorption of light. Abs orbance is also called optical density (OD) and is usually mea-
sured with a spectrophotometer (also called a spectrometer). Absorbance is used more
often than turbidity because spectrometers are more commonly available than turbidi-
meters.
If a small amount of microbial suspension is placed in a sample tube, its turbidity, or
the amount of light dispersed toward the photocell, is proportional, up to a point, to the
number of particles in the suspensio n. Similarly, for absorbance, the amount of light that
passes through the suspension will be inversely proportional to the concentration of organ-
isms, provided that particle size does not change. This is a form of Beer’s law (absorbance
is proportional to concentration), which is the basis of most quantitative spectrophotome-
try (although in this case a substantial amount of the light is refracted rather than actually
absorbed). Thus, increases in either turbidity or absorbance can be used as a surrogate
measure of growth, or correlated through use of a calibration curve to microbial counts
obtained by other methods.
One advantage of using turbidity or absorbance is that they are not destructive of the
culture. In fact, special flasks with sidearms are available so that the turbidity of a pure
culture can be determined over time without the need to open the flask and risk contam-
ination. However, if particle size increases, through flocculent growth or filament elonga-
tion, turbidity and OD will underestimate the cell count or biomass. Also, this approach
generally cannot be used with environmenta l samples.
Counting Viruses and Bacteriovores Viruses are too small to see under any light micro-
scope for direct counting. Also, since they grow only wi thin cells of other organisms, they
COUNTS OF MICROORGANISM NUMBERS 309