cometabolism, or alternatively, it may develop new enzymes and pathways so that the
dead-end product can be further utilized. Although it is not beneficial to the microorgan-
ism, cometabolism may be desirable from a human point of view because it may be pos-
sible to exploit it to degrade otherwise nondegradable compounds.
Even with energy-yielding metabolism, dead-end products may form. In other cases,
intermediates may accumulate because their rate of production is greater than their rate of
further transformation. Occasionally, this accumulating compound will be more toxic than
the parent material, leading to at least a temporary increase in toxicity during biodegrada-
tion. The increased toxicity may have the effect of further slowing degradative activity, as
well as having other undesirable effects on the ecosystem.
In aero bic systems it is common for a single species of bacteria to be able to utilize a
single organic compound as its sole source of carbon and energy. However, occasionally,
organisms of one species can degrade the compound only partially, and those of another
species will further transform, and probably mineralize, the intermediate produced. Such a
combination of organisms of different species ‘‘working together’’ to metabolize sub-
strates is referred to as a consortium (plural, consortia).
The activities of consortia can make detection of cometabolism difficult, as a cometa-
bolic product may be degraded by other organisms before it accumulates sufficiently to be
noticed. Also, the fact that a compound can be completely degraded by a single organism
does not necessarily mean that this is the way it will be degraded in a particular
environment—the actual degradation still may be by a consortium.
Under anaerobic conditions, consortia are com mon. A wide variety of species may be
involved in hydrolyzing, or solubilizing, complex organics, followed by fermentations of
the subunits produced. Then sulfate-reducing or methanogenic organisms may utilize the
fermentation products, leading to mineralization.
The organisms in a microbial consortium may be only loosely associated, or they may
be so closely linked that they are difficult to separate. A classic example is the case of
methane production from ethanol. For many years this was attributed to Methanobacillus
omelianskii, an ‘‘organism’’ that could be grown in ‘‘pure’’ culture with ethanol as the
sole carbon and energy source. However, it was later demonstrated that, in fact, the cultur e
contained two species: a bacterium that converted ethanol to acetate, and a methanogen
(Archaea) that utilized the acetate, producing methane and carbon dioxide.
Occasionally, the balance among organisms in an anaerobic consortium is disturbed
and mineralization does not occur. In the absence of sulfate, anaerobic mineralization
is dependent on methanogens. Compared to the wide variety of organisms that are able
to hydrolyze and ferment organics anaer obically, methanogens are a relatively limited
group of strictly anaerobic archaea. Although most methanogens utilize acetic acid as a
substrate, as a group they are sensitive to low pH. If the acetic acid is produced too
quickly, the pH of the system will drop, inhibiting methanogenic activity. In turn, this
leads to a further buildup of acid, a greater drop in pH, and even lower rates of methano-
genesis and acid destruction.
Some human foods, such as pickles and sauerkraut, are preserved in this way. Ensi-
lage, the process of making silage, is a means of animal feed preservation utilizing
acid anaerobic conditions that has been employed in agriculture for many years. Fresh
corn, hay, or other feed crops are placed in a silo, where they quickly ferment. The
acid anaerobic conditions then prevent substantial further degradation. However, if oxy-
gen is introduced in large amounts, the organic acids are quickly mineralized, pH rises,
and biodegradation resumes.
CARBON 409