REFERENCES
1. E. A. Nebesky, G. L. Schulz, and F. J. Rubinate, ‘‘Packaging for
Space Flights,’’ Activities Report, 17, 32–36 (1965).
2. A. D. Catterson, E. P. McCutcheon, H. A. Minners, and R. A.
Pollard, ‘‘Aeromedical Observations, in Mercury Project Sum-
mary Including Results of the Fourth Manned Orbital Flight,’’
NASA SP-45, 315 (1963).
3. M. V. Klicka and M. C. Smith, ‘‘Food for U.S. Manned Space
Flight,’’ Technical Report NATICK/TR-82/019.
4. M. C. Smith, R. M. Rapp, C. S. Huber, P. C. Rambaut, and N. D.
Heidelbaugh, ‘‘Apollo Experience Report—Food Systems,’’
Technical Report NASA TN D-7720 (1974).
5. NASA’s Exploration Systems Architecture Study, Final
Report, 2005. NASA-TM-2005-214062. http://www.nasa.gov/
mission_pages/exploration/news/ESAS_report.html.
6. J. M. Jay, Modern Food Microbiology, 4th ed., Chapman and
Hall, New York, 1992, p. 34.
7. R. A. Armstrong, ‘‘Effects of Polymer Structure on Gas Barrier of
Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol (EVOH) and Considerations for Package
Development,’’ TAPPI 2002 PLACE Conference (2002).
FORENSIC PACKAGING
JACK L. ROSETTE
Forensic Packaging Concepts,
Inc., Del Rio, Tennessee
Forensic packaging is a legal term describing the science
of determining the cause of package function as intended.
Most people think of forensics as being associated with
criminal investigation (especially homicide), when in rea-
lity there are many areas of forensic specialization. For-
ensic medicine involves the cause of disease, forensic
pathology is related to the cause of death, forensic psy-
chiatry seeks the cause of mental disorders, forensic
engineering is used to determine the cause of accidents
such as train or automobile, forensic accounting identifies
procedures used to hide illegal accounting such as embez-
zlement, and forensics in law enforcement refers to scien-
tific physical evidence such as latent prints, ballistics,
handwriting, fiber analysis, and similar sciences.
Walter Stern, a packaging consultant in Wilmette,
Illinois, was the first person known to use the term
forensics in defining the science of determining the cause
of a package to fail to function that resulted in injury.
Forensic Packaging was recognized as a forensic science
by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in 1997.
Determining the cause of package failure may be as
simple as discovering that liners are missing from a closure
or as complicated as duplicating actual environmental
factors such as (a) temperature and humidity present
during the time the package was in transport and storage
and (b) measuring the effect the conditions have on the
subject package. Determining the cause of package failure
may fall on the shoulders of any person involved in the sale,
manufacture, or use of the package. If the salesperson is
unable to readily identify the cause, production may be
asked to determine the cause. If production determines
that the package was produced in spec (specification), the
packaging engineer may analyze whether the spec was
sufficient to meet the objectives of the package under the
changing conditions. If the engineer is unable to determine
the cause, a specialist in forensic packaging may be needed
to identify all factors related to the package and conduct
extensive tests to determine the cause and recommend
solutions to the problem.
The concepts of forensic packaging are most useful in
identifying weaknesses in the package design, so that a
better package or component can be made and the possi-
bility of package failure can be reduced. Improvements
resulting from proper application of forensic packaging
concepts are not limited to materials or designs but may
also involve manufacturing processes.
The science of forensic packaging requires an objective
analytical process, where the results can be replicated by
others using the same procedure. Many of the procedures
used are found in ASTM 15.06, such as vibration, torque
retention, and drop tests. Others may have been developed
by various manufacturers, packaging schools, or indepen-
dent laboratories. The source of the procedure is not as
important as its relationship to the problem, reliability of
its results, and ability to be replicated by others.
Many improvements in packaging have been the result
of identifying the cause of a package failure such as new
media for corrugated cartons to increase stacking
strength, easier-to-open child-resistant closures, improved
lettering on labels, and better barrier properties in films.
Identifying and correcting any weakness in a package
before the package fails results in savings in tooling, fewer
claims of defective products, higher customer satisfaction,
and improved profits.
In today’s litigious atmosphere, forensic packaging
becomes most useful in legal actions. The science of
forensic packaging, when properly applied and explained,
can be used to objectively explain the process used in
developing a package so that it will function as intended,
that any weaknesses known would not affect package
performance, or that the cause of package failure was
not foreseeable and reasonable for the package to encoun-
ter. It is reasonable to expect that the package would
survive transport and storage in the high temperatures of
the summer, but is it reasonable to expect it to withstand
abuse by the consumer? The level of abuse the package
would withstand should be determined by testing, includ-
ing normal use and extreme abuse.
In some cases the package was designed with several
safeguards, functioned as intended, but the consumer
ignored indications of prior opening and died after consum-
ing an adulterated product that resulted in severe injury or
toxicity. Should the company have been liable for the failure
of the consumer, when the physical evidence of the package
remains indicated that it functioned properly?
A qualified forensic packaging consultant or scientist
can explain in either technical or lay terms the cause of
and solutions to any problem so that the problem can be
understood. The results of all tests performed by the
consultant or in-house scientist should be verifiable and
FORENSIC PACKAGING 539