
542 8. Electromagnetic Waves in Dispersive Media and Anisotropic Media
0.0 .5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
0.0 .5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Z
M
Z
0
F
1
F
2
0
ZZ
0
ZZ
Figure 8.25: Plots of χ
1
and χ
2
with respect to frequency for lossless ferrites.
(2) Lossy Ferrites, Damping
In practice, there are losses associated with the motion of the dipoles in an
actual gyromagnetic medium. The exact details of the mechanisms contribut-
ing to the magnetic losses or the damping of the precessional motion are just
beginning to be understood; refer to [57]. It is, however, more convenient
to represent the loss phenomenologically in the equation of motion. That
is, a term that has the proper dimension and appropriately represents the
experimentally observed result can be added. Historically, there have been
two basic forms of the loss term, the Landau–Lifshitz (L-L) form and the
Bloch–Bloembergen (B-B) form. The L-L form can be intro duced into the
expressions of the constitutional parameters by a simple mathematical pro-
cedure and, since it represents the overall losses adequately in a simple form,
is suitable for describing the wave propagation phenomena. The B-B form,
however, is more useful in describing the individual types of relaxation pro-
cesses and can serve as the basis of the discussion of the physical principles
of relaxation. In this book, only the L-L form will be introduced.
In the Landau–Lifshitz equation, losses present in a ferrite may be ac-
counted for by introducing into the equation of motion (8.277) a damping
term that will produce a torque tending to reduce the precession angle θ, i.e.,
dm
dt
= −γ (m × B) + α
µ
m
|m|
×
dm
dt
¶
, (8.300)
where α is a dimensionless damping factor. The additional damping term
on the right-hand side of (8.300) is a vector perpendicular to m. Thus the
amplitude of the precession angle can be influenced, but the magnitude of
the magnetization vector is not affected by the damping term. See Fig. 8.26.