446 Chapter Seven
degradation in properties in PVC pipe that had been installed for 15 years.
This was also reported by Bauer
8
who said, “PVC pipe’s ability to per-
form has not changed over 15 years and all indications suggest it will
not change in the foreseeable future.”
In the original survey, 22 utilities reported a significant number of
problems occurring more than 5 years after installation. These utilities
were selected for a detailed follow-up phone survey concerning long-term
performance of PVC pipe. Long-term as used in this context refers to pipe
that has been in service for at least 5 years. Performance items of inter-
est included joint problems, pressure-related problems (breaks), and
problems associated with tapping. Real or perceived problems associated
with the inability to locate buried PVC pipe and problems resulting from
future excavation around the pipe are not considered to be performance-
related and were not addressed in the follow-up phone calls.
Of the 22 utilities selected for additional long-term information, 13
utilities, or 59 percent, reported no performance-related long-term
problems. The problems reported by these 13 utilities in the original
survey were long-term, but were not pipe-related.
This left 9 utilities that did report performance-related problems. One
of the 9 was dropped from the analysis, as all the reported problems for
that utility occurred within the first to fifth year of service. The 8
remaining utilities provided information about the types of problems
they were experiencing, number of problems in the 5-year period, the
length of time in service of the pipe, and whether the frequency of the
problems was increasing, decreasing, or remaining static. Long-term
problems were classified in three broad categories (joint problems, pres-
sure problems, and tapping problems). The joint classification includes
all long-term problems that can be directly associated with the joint (i.e.,
joint leakage) that can be attributed to the aging of the pipe. The tap-
ping classification as used here is for tapping problems that are per-
ceived to occur on a more frequent basis as the PVC pipe ages. The
pressure classification includes all other long-term problems such as
breaks and leaks, other than joints and tapping, that can be attributed
to the aging of the PVC pipe. Shown in Fig. 7.34 is a breakdown of the
reported problems by type. Three utilities reported having joint prob-
lems, three utilities reported having pressure-break problems, and two
utilities reported both joint and pressure problems. None of the utilities
experienced any tapping problems related to aging.
Figure 7.35 shows the total number of occurrences reported over the
5-year period for each problem type. In the 5-year period, there were
more than 3 times as many pressure-related problems as there were
joint-related problems reported. The large majority of the data in this
figure was supplied by one utility, and for that reason this figure is
biased and is not representative of the balance of the utilities surveyed.