that the future of the tubular design lies with systems having outputs greater than
1 MW.
A major disadvantage associated with the tubular design is the low power
density (0.3 MW m
3
). There are two main reasons for this. One is the inherent
low stacking density of the individual fuel cells; the other is the high internal
resistance of the cell arising because of the long circumferential paths the current
has to take in the cell tubes to reach the interconnects. A further disadvantage is
cost arising from the rather sophisticated fabrication technologies (EVD)
involved.
The planar format presents many fabrication challenges, as mentioned above,
but the bonus is an estimated power density of approximately 2 MW m
3
and
flexibility for constructing power sources to a required rating. A present objective
is to build a relatively small power (up to 10 kW) module which could be mass-
produced and then integrated with similar modules to meet power requirements
ranging from on-board transport to static, large scale distribution. All the
technologies for fabricating the cell are cheap and suited to mass production. The
electrolyte and interconnect can be tape-cast, calendered or pressed and the
porous electrodes formed by slurry-coating. The major challenge is to achieve a
reliable high temperature edge-sealing technology. However, as is usually the
case, once the problem has been clearly defined a solution will be found, and even
if this is an expensive solution widespread adoption soon lowers the price (the
initially very costly, fully dense alumina tube, later universally exploited in high
pressure public lighting, is a classic example). If it proves possible to successfully
exploit the more highly conducting Gd-doped ceria for the electrolyte then the
lower operating temperatures (500 8C) will very significantly ease the sealing
challenge.
In conclusion, fuel cell technology has to be seen ‘in the round’. The PEM cell
is certainly favoured for automotive power. Its serious drawback has nothing to
do with the cell technology per se, rather with the fact that it runs on hydrogen
and the infrastructure to supply the gas does not exist, at least not to any
significant extent. It can be combined with a fuel reforming plant to produce
hydrogen from a hydrocarbon but then, because the system is ‘cold’, the
incorporation of such a reformer carries with it its own penalties regarding
efficiency. The cell is regarded as a power source for far more than the motor car;
for example it is seen as the candidate for powering lap-top computers, torches
and for any equipment presently powered by batteries. Some projections
envisage the domestic home powered totally from PEM cells.
The intermediate temperature SOFC offers an advantage over the PEM cell of
a predicted higher efficiency, 45–50% compared to 30%. It can also be integrated
with a reformer which, utilizing some of the ‘waste’ heat, produces useable fuels,
(H
2
and CO) from a hydrocarbon fuel.
The tubular technology as described above is suited only to static power-
generation. In contrast the planar format is far more versatile and, especially if it
FUEL CELLS AND BATTERIES 195