then serves to heavily reinoculate the new pile with A. fumigatus. Elevated levels have
also been observed at some leaf composting sites during the turning of windrows.
The overall composting reaction can be described using a modified form of the basic
equation for aerobic respiration:
organic matter þ O
2
! CO
2
þ H
2
O þ compost þ heat ð16:5Þ
From this expression it can be seen that the rate of organic matter stabilization is propor-
tional to the rate of heat production. Thus, maximizing the rate of heat produc tion will
maximize the rate of stabilization. However, if the material becomes too hot, rates slow
dramatically. Once active self-heating occurs, therefore, it is necessary to remove heat at
approximately the same rate it is released, so as to avoid exceeding 60
C in the material.
This should be a major concern in system design, as the amount of heat requiring removal
can be substantial. The amount of heat released per mass of oxygen consumed is approxi-
mately 14,000 J/g and is very nearly constant for a wide variety of different organic mate-
rials. At the same time, it would be necessary to provide adequate oxygen to reach this
oxidative heat release, and to keep moisture and other parameters within a desirable range.
The goal of a composting system is to stabilize the particular material being treated in
an efficient, economical, and environmentally sound manner. For some materials, such as
leaves, a low-cost system can be used, even though the conditions it provides do not come
close to maximizing composting rates. This is because the facility, if it is large and iso-
lated enough, can simply allow extra time for completion (e.g., 6 to 18 months), and the
materials can be managed so as not to cause problems during this time . Other materials,
such as sludges, however, usually demand closer control and require composting systems
that much more nearly achieve maximum rates. Otherwise, problems are likely to occur,
and costs may soar.
Although there are many variations, there are really three approaches to large-scale
composting: mixing; forced aeration; and both. Any of the three potentially can be
done out in the open, under a roof, or in an enclosed reactor, although some combinations
are more common and/or logical. Interestingly, almost all systems are operated as batch
processes rather than continuous feed, as is the case with most other waste treatment
systems.
Probably the most common type of composting, such as that shown in Figure 16.49, is
that of windrowing. The sludge-plus-bulking agent windrow piles are constructed in an
elongated, haystack shape (in cross section) up to perhaps 1.3 to 2 m (4 to 6 ft) high
and 4 to 5 m (12 to 15 ft) wide, and lengths reaching up to and beyond 100 m
(300 ft). Periodically (e.g., twice a week initially, monthly later) it is mixed, or turned,
using a front-end loader or specialized turning machine (as can be seen in the background
of Figure 16.49). Windrowing is virtually the only method used for yard waste compost-
ing and is also used occasionally for sludges and solid was tes in areas that are sufficiently
isolated, handling small volumes, or with other special circumstances. Also, it is com-
monly used in a curing stage, a low-rate finishing step after a more active composting
phase. In some cases, the material is enclosed in bins, and mixed there: essentially, ‘‘wind-
rowing’’ within an isolated reactor.
One disadvantage of static piles and other unmixed systems is that stratification occurs
with gradients of temperature and moisture within the pile. Thus, some portions of the
material may not heat sufficiently for pathogen kill, whereas others may dry or overheat
and become inactive. Periodic windrow mixing or turning, therefor e, helps to ensur e
SLUDGE TREATMENT 657