
government acknowledged the nation’s obligations to its own citizens,
such as those who had supplied funds for the patriot armies during
the wars of independence. Over time more and more claimants pre-
sented larger and larger claims. In 1851 the state-recognized internal
debt amounted to 4.88 million pesos; by 1858, it had grown to 23.2
million pesos, or five times the annual budget of 1850 (Contreras and
Cueto 2000, 125). Governmental corruption lay at the heart of much
of this drastic increase. The state also acted intentionally to transfer
public savings to private hands in the hope of promoting investments.
The state’s recognition of an internal debt was intended to foster the
development of an entrepreneurial middle class and to forestall suspi-
cions harbored by nationalists about the government’s relations with
foreign capitalists.
Rather than becoming revenue producers, as hoped, Peruvians con-
tinued to receive money from the state. Peruvian historians Carlos
Contreras and Marcos Cueto (2000, 133) have calculated that each
Peruvian cost the state five times more a year than he or she contributed
to the state. During the boom the gap was filled by guano revenues. Who
gained from these state-earned distributions? According to Peruvian his-
torian Alfonso Quiroz in his 1987 book, La deuda defraudada, a total of
2,028 people r
eceived state bonds; however, two-thirds of the total bond
value was held by only 126 people, mostly large land owners and mer-
chants and some state bureaucrats. Money thus obtained from state cof-
fers was only marginally invested in productive ventures, such as a few
banks and small textile and food industries. In large measure the money
was reloaned to the state. For lenders this was a less risky investment
with higher yields than investing in industrial development, at least
until the Peruvian state went bankrupt. In a sense the Peruvian guano
age suffered from what contemporary economists would call the “Dutch
disease.” Abundance of money lowered prices for imported goods and
increased labor costs, whereas the high profitability of guano exports
increased the borrowing price of money (that is, interest rates).
During the boom Lima and other coastal cities benefited most from
guano revenues, sometimes through the internal debt mechanism but
more often simply because more money entered the economy. For
example, real salaries increased on average 3 percent annually.
However, with more money circulating in the cities came inflation, and
inflation further accentuated economic differentiation. Between 1856
and 1869 the accumulated price inflation surpassed 100 percent. As a
result labor conditions and standards of living worsened. Lima’s arti-
sans were the first to react when in 1858 they marched through the
127
THE AGE OF GUANO